Gao’s logit-diff ablation is not a circuit rule
Gao et al.'s logit-diff ablation score measures how sparse an SAE latent's effect on output logits is. It is not a rule for admitting circuit components.
Math behind J-lens/Jacobian, layer-specific behavior, experiments replicating on open models (Qwen, etc.), code/tutorials for probing J-space.
Gao et al.'s logit-diff ablation score measures how sparse an SAE latent's effect on output logits is. It is not a rule for admitting circuit components.
Gao et al. (2024) cite the BERT interpretability illusion as a gloss: random activating examples can make an overly broad feature explanation look right.
In arXiv:2412.09565v2 (Bailey et al., 8 Feb 2025), an activation is obfuscated against a named latent-space monitor D, not obfuscated in the abstract.
An extracted subgraph is not yet a causal circuit. Read it as causal only after the paper’s own intervention controls are fixed, and do not fill parameters…
These are three different early-token procedures, not three placements of one prefix. In Ding, Li, and Zhang, ETA ( arXiv:2410.06625v2 , ICLR 2025; version…
In arXiv:2602.13483v2, ACC++ forms one rank-1 candidate for each pair (upstream component, singular direction of the head’s QK matrix Ω), builds the…
GPT-4 writes natural-language explanations of 307,200 GPT-2 XL MLP neurons across 48 layers, then scores them by simulating activations on held-out text.
Saturating nonlinearities, competitive attention, and sparse writes mark true ignition in residual streams. Residual drift alone fails the criterion.
Two-hop circuits compose facts via a residual-stream bridge instead of an A-to-C shortcut. Knowing both facts still fails the composed query.
Packing many harmful demos into long context lifts attack success. Refusal features may stay SAE-readable even when the model complies.